Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. What's up with the Plex trend in courier contracts? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
They appear more often now. What's the use? Everyone is completely nuts and we all forget to go to a trade-hub to redeem them or what? I don't get it. Why would you even want to haul Plex anyway? I bet it's a scam, not sure how though.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.22 17:54:00
|
182. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alxea wrote: U mad bro?... yep he mad! If you really read my post then you could have seen that this was never a "lol, u mad bro" rant about my mining ship being blown up or anything. I don't even have a Hulk. Or any mining barge for that ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.07 22:23:00
|
183. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gerald Taric wrote: Funny. Very funny. So we have here the one side "Carebears" complaining about the "Gankers" having no great risk, and somehow an easy live, where on the other side --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.07 14:44:00
|
184. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Simetraz wrote: I would rather have CCP create a licence or something a true bounty hunter. You would have a monthly bill for the license. You get so much ISK based on Persons standing to concord for blowing up there ship -0.01 to -10 But if ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.07 07:37:00
|
185. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Poetic Stanziel wrote: This doesn't sound terrible, though I'd make that secstatus be 5.0 (not something easy like 3.5). I'd need to hear of the possible exploitative behaviour involved in the idea, before I could get behind it. I'm sure someon...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.06 23:54:00
|
186. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: If faction police are chasing somebody, you can shoot their ships. If they're -5 or below, you can shoot their pods. That's not really what I meant Andski. Faction police can hunt down certain players, but proper gankers make...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.06 17:20:00
|
187. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TLDR: at bottom. With all the Hulkageddon kills going around, you will end up with compaints regarding unfair ganking and whatnot. And truth be told, ganking is never "fair". It's a dirty fight where the outcome is more or less pre-determined. Bo...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.06 17:12:00
|
188. Storyline Mission tracker. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Can we, for the love of Quafe, please get an in-game automatic tracker that keeps a count of how many missions you have done / or still need to do before a storyline mission will occur? We have to do everything by ourselves now by keeping notes o...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.05 00:09:00
|
189. Delay CONCORD response time by factor 3x - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How about.....no? Unless players with a sec status of 3.0 or higher can actively shoot at any player with a negative sec. status. (this without CONCORD interference) Gankers vs. Sheriffs. Coming to a system near you.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.02 13:28:00
|
190. A question on right of defense. - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
This is derived from a topic on the general forum, which this part didn't get a proper answer and I still would like to know the in-game mechanics. Anyway, Let's set an example. Player 1 has a freighter and is planning to haul a valuable commodit...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.30 07:10:00
|
191. Fair warning: HULKAGEDDON V starts tonight at 0:00 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I didn't want to create a new post to the forums about this, but I do hope that it will not be overlooked here either. I have some questions on this event if I may. First: which ships are the targets? Obviously, Hulks and Mackinaws according t...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.29 19:17:00
|
192. CCP - Why are we allowing one alliance to control eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kengutsi Akira wrote: Singulis Pacifica wrote: evereplicant, CCP will not do anything about this, simply because they do not wish to. They monitor and as soon as the Goons do something that would damage CCP in any way, they would take nec...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.26 12:22:00
|
193. CCP - Why are we allowing one alliance to control eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evereplicant, CCP will not do anything about this, simply because they do not wish to. They monitor and as soon as the Goons do something that would damage CCP in any way, they would take necessary actions. Suppose the Goons would be able to ha...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.25 19:19:00
|
194. Audio glitching on jumps/docking. - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Ah, so I'm not the only one with that issue. Thought my computer was going bonkers. The Fitting screen sound (ALT-F) is very low as well.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.25 07:54:00
|
195. A tale of honesty. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is not going to be some drama posted in the wrong forum. I just thought I would share this with the rest of the community. So I played this game back in 2004-2005 (I think) but then quit because I had no time to play it anymore and I got bor...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.04.07 23:49:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |